FIELD: medicine, psychiatry, neurology, medicinal psychology.
SUBSTANCE: a questionnaire should be given for a patient to conduct evaluation in points. Moreover, the questionnaire includes 10 scales: 1 - general anxiety, 2 - anxiety in relations with persons of the same age, 3 - anxiety associated with how surrounding people evaluate a patient; 4 - anxiety associated with relations with teachers, 5 - anxiety in relations with parents, 6 - anxiety associated with success in education, 7 - anxiety originated in situations of a patient's self-expression, 8 - anxiety originated in situations of checking a patient's knowledge level, 9 - anxiety-induced decreased psychical activity, 10 - increased autonomic reactivity. Each of these 10 scales depicts one out of four psychological parameters: the scales 1, 3 and 7 - the evaluation of anxiety level directly referring to a patient's personal demands, the scales 9 and 10 - the evaluation of a patient's peculiarities of psycho-physiological and psycho-autonomic reaction in stress situations, the scales 2,4 and 5 - the evaluation of the role in development of a patient's anxiety reactions and states, the peculiarities of a patient's social contacts, the scales 6 and 8 - the evaluation of the role in the development of a patient's anxiety reactions and states in situations associated with school education. Also, each scale contains 10 questions that reflect psychological specificity of each of them. For each sub-sample it is necessary to transform the values of primary evaluations by all the scales into z-evaluations by the following formula: , where X - primary evaluation by test, - an average value for normal group, SD - standard deviation against an average value for normal group. At z-evaluations ranged -2.5 up to -1 z-points one should diagnose no anxiety; from -1 up to +1 z-points - normal level; from +1 up to +2 z-points - increased level of anxiety and from +2 up to +3 z-points - the extreme degree of anxiety should be stated upon. The innovation improved the significance of diagnostics due to the most informative values of emotional-behavioral disorders of the anxiety register in the questionnaire given for such patients.
EFFECT: higher accuracy and efficiency of diagnostics.
10 tbl
Title | Year | Author | Number |
---|---|---|---|
METHOD FOR ASSESSING ANXIETY IN CHILDREN | 2015 |
|
RU2590988C1 |
METHOD FOR GIVING PSYCHODIAGNOSTIC ESTIMATION OF CHILDREN ANXIOUSNESS | 2000 |
|
RU2160047C1 |
METHOD OF ESTIMATION OF TEENAGERS' SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL ADAPTATION DISORDER DEGREE CAUSED BY BEER ALCOHOLISATION | 2007 |
|
RU2346651C1 |
METHOD FOR PREDICTION OF RISK OF DEVIANT BEHAVIOUR OF ADOLESCENT | 2015 |
|
RU2593744C1 |
METHOD OF DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSTICS OF STRESS IN ADOLESCENTS FINDING THEMSELVES IN DIFFICULT LIFE SITUATION | 2023 |
|
RU2810814C1 |
METHOD FOR EXERTING PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC ACTION UPON CHILDREN | 2000 |
|
RU2160607C1 |
METHOD FOR DETECTING TOTAL HUMAN BODY STATE | 2004 |
|
RU2286715C2 |
METHOD FOR DEVELOPING EMOTIONAL AND INTELLECTUAL SKILLS OF CHILDREN | 2019 |
|
RU2734133C1 |
METHOD OF DETECTING ALEXITHYMIA FOR SUBSEQUENT CORRECTION IN ADOLESCENTS WITH SENSORY DISORDERS ACCOMPANIED BY DISORDERS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT | 2015 |
|
RU2599345C1 |
METHOD OF ASSESSING THE ADAPTIVE CAPABILITIES OF CHILDREN TO THE IMPACT OF EDUCATIONAL WORKLOAD | 2022 |
|
RU2801608C1 |
Authors
Dates
2007-04-20—Published
2004-04-27—Filed