FIELD: medicine, obstetrics.
SUBSTANCE: one should carry out clinical and ultrasound uterine testing, moreover, additionally, on the 3d and the 7th d of post-operational period it is necessary to detect conditional area of uterine sutures, systolo-diastolic ratio (SDR), percentage content of lymphocytes against total amount of cells in uterine aspirate to establish protein coefficient (PC) and leukocytic index of intoxication (LII) being necessary to state upon prognostic coefficients F1 and F2 by the following formulas: F1 = -6726.59 + 27.58 x K1 + 21.84 x K2 - 0.03 x K3 + 93.36 x K4 + 156.47 x K5 - 4.21 x K6 + 760.82 x K7 + 978.46 x K8 + 11.47 x K9 + 96.40 x K10 + 306.40 x K11 + 321.13 x K12 - 24.32 x K13 - 50.56 x K14; F2 = -57.81.76 + 35.89 x K1 + 26.50 x K2 + 0.00 x K3 + 96.81 x K4 + 146.78 x K5 - 3.89 x K6 + 500.76 x K7 + 651.60 x K8 + 4.83 x K9 + 34.83 x K10 + 276.16 x K11 + 535.35 x K12 - 14.26 x K13 - 17.28 x K14, where digital values - the constants of discriminant equation and discriminant coefficients, K1,2...14 - gradations and digital values of post-operational period flow: K1 - the length of uterine sutures on the 3d d, K2 - the width of uterine sutures on the 3d d, K3 - conditional area of sutures on the 3d d, K4 - the length of uterine sutures on the 7th d, K5 - the width of uterine sutures on the 7th d, K6 - conditional area of sutures on the 7th d, K7 - SDR right-hand on the 7th d, K8 - SDR left-hand on the 7th d, K9 - percentage content of lymphocytes against the total amount of cells in uterine aspirate on the 3d d, K10 - percentage content of lymphocytes against the total amount of cells in uterine aspirate on the 7th d, K11 - PC on the 3d d, K12 - PC on the 7th d, K13 - LII on the 3d d, K14 - LII on the 7th d, and at F1>F2 one should predict favorable nature in recovery of uterine wound and at F1<F2 - unfavorable nature.
EFFECT: higher accuracy and efficiency of evaluation.
2 ex
Title | Year | Author | Number |
---|---|---|---|
ESTIMATION METHOD OF THE STATE OF UTERINE SCAR AFTER ONE-SINGLE CESAREAN SECTION | 2016 |
|
RU2648878C2 |
METHOD FOR EVALUATING UTERINE WOUND COALESCENCE AFTER PERFORMING CESAREAN SECTION OPERATION | 2000 |
|
RU2169370C1 |
METHOD FOR PREDICTING THE CHARACTER OF UTERINE WOUND HEALING AFTER CAESAREAN OPERATION | 2001 |
|
RU2216275C2 |
METHOD FOR PREDICTION OF PROBABILITY OF RESTENOSIS PROGRESSION FOLLOWING CORONARY STENTING | 2012 |
|
RU2532340C2 |
METHOD FOR EVALUATING HEALING DEGREE OF UTERINE WOUND AFTER CESAREAN SECTION OPERATION | 2000 |
|
RU2175524C1 |
DEVICE FOR ESTIMATING COLLECTION ITEMS | 2004 |
|
RU2264654C1 |
METHOD FOR PREVENTING ENDOMETRITIS AS CONSEQUENCE OF CESAREAN SECTION | 1996 |
|
RU2133623C1 |
APPLICATION SORPTION METHOD FOR PREVENTING FROM PYOSEPTIC COMPLICATIONS IN HIGH INFECTION RISK GROUP OF PUERPERAS SUBJECTED TO CESAREAN SECTION | 1996 |
|
RU2144797C1 |
METHOD FOR ACTIVATING TISSUE REGENERATION AND HEALING OF A POSTOPERATIVE WOUND ON THE UTERUS DURING CESAREAN SECTION | 2021 |
|
RU2781150C1 |
METHOD FOR EVALUATING UTERINE SUBINVOLUTION AFTER CAESAREAN OPERATION | 2002 |
|
RU2229844C2 |
Authors
Dates
2005-11-20—Published
2003-03-19—Filed