FIELD: medicine.
SUBSTANCE: method involves pre- and post-surgical spiral computed and magnetic resonance tomography of an involved spine. A height of superjacent spine Ha and subjacent spine Hb are measured. A cross-sectional dimension of the spinal canal of the superjacent spine is measured as a distance from a posterior surface of the vertebral body to an inner surface of the related vertebral arch in a median sagittal plane da. A cross-sectional dimension of the spinal canal of the superjacent spine is measured as a distance from a posterior surface of the vertebral body to an inner surface of the related vertebral arch in a median sagittal plane da. A cross-sectional dimension of the spinal canal within a maximum narrowing is measured as a pre- d and post-surgical d* distance from the posterior surface of the vertebral body to the inner surface of the related vertebral arch in the median sagittal plane. A pre- h and post-surgical h* distance from the posterior surface of the vertebral body to a stenosis factor point farthest from the posterior surface of the vertebral body in the median sagittal plane is measured. A pre- s and post-surgical s* horizontal half-distance between extreme stenosis factor points on the inner surface of the vertebral arch is measured. A spinal canal surgical correction coefficient Kk, pre- Vd and post-surgical Vd * spinal canal volume deficiency coefficients, a pre- Vs and post-surgical Vs * volume of a stenosis factor portion penetrating into the spinal canal, non-dimensional variables x and y, x* and y* are calculated by formulas. If Kk is more than 0.4, the surgical correction of the spinal canal is considered satisfactory.
EFFECT: method enables the accurate quantitative assessment of the spinal canal stenosis at any level thereof and the accurate qualitative assessment of the surgical correction of the spinal canal by performing spiral computed and magnetic resonance tomography and measuring the most important dimensions that makes it possible to calculate the volume of the stenosis factor portion penetrated into the spinal canal.
4 dwg
Title | Year | Author | Number |
---|---|---|---|
METHOD FOR ASSESSING SURGICAL CORRECTION OF SPINAL CANAL | 2010 |
|
RU2429782C1 |
METHOD FOR PERCOETANEOUS TRANSPEDICULAR STABILISATION OF THORACIC AND LUMBAR SPINE | 2014 |
|
RU2577940C2 |
DEVICE FOR PERCUTANEOUS TRANSPEDICULAR STABILISATION OF SPINAL CORD | 2014 |
|
RU2583245C2 |
VERTEBROPLASTY TECHNIQUE | 2012 |
|
RU2509535C1 |
VERTEBROPLASTY TECHNIQUE | 2013 |
|
RU2540093C2 |
METHOD OF DIAGNOSING STENOSING PROCESSES OF VERTEBRAL CANAL AND DURAL SAC AT WAIST LEVEL | 2011 |
|
RU2483675C2 |
METHOD OF ESTIMATING DEFICIT OF SPINAL CANAL VOLUME AT LEVEL OF AFFECTED SEGMENT DEFECT | 2009 |
|
RU2396896C1 |
METHOD FOR LUMBAR SPINAL MOTION SEGMENT REPAIR | 2013 |
|
RU2527150C1 |
METHOD FOR DETERMINATION OF SAGITTAL SIZE OF COMPRESSING FACTOR | 2015 |
|
RU2640451C2 |
METHOD OF RESTORING THE BALANCE OF THE SPINE IN CONGENITAL AND SYSTEMIC CERVICAL DEFORMITY | 2022 |
|
RU2803691C1 |
Authors
Dates
2016-03-20—Published
2014-08-14—Filed